Actually, they'd be a 'tweeter' because a Twitter post is called a 'tweet.'
I'm going to invent a service called Sputter, where you post one of only four emoticons to express your status. That would just about remove all meaning and purpose from social network communications entirely.
8 comments:
Actually, they'd be a 'tweeter' because a Twitter post is called a 'tweet.'
I'm going to invent a service called Sputter, where you post one of only four emoticons to express your status. That would just about remove all meaning and purpose from social network communications entirely.
I thought they were called tweep's. But that may be derogatory...
I always thought "twit" most appropriate!
The twitterererer.. ers friends that have been clogging my Facebook home pace = Annoying. Grrrr.
Prof. Anon.,
Sputter would certainly remove what little purpose is left in social networking. Twitter has done a pretty good job already...
yolio,
I should have included Tweep as an option. Of course Twit isn't exactly complimentary.
TWIT indeed.
Prof Anon - great idea!
Apparently they are called twitists.....
I prefer to call them Twats
-antipodean
Post a Comment